[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [ft-devel] About the Cmap format 12
From: |
mpsuzuki |
Subject: |
Re: [ft-devel] About the Cmap format 12 |
Date: |
Wed, 3 Oct 2007 12:31:52 +0900 |
Hi,
On Mon, 01 Oct 2007 00:22:41 +0200 (CEST)
Werner LEMBERG <address@hidden> wrote:
>> I found that FreeType can not get the correct glyph index from the
>> font "Simsun-extb" corroding the Unicode of the character.
>
>Using version 0.90 of this font, I see no problems with `ftview -e
>unic'. However, this font version's `post' table is buggy; it misses
>all indices 0x7FFF into the glyph name string array, thus FreeType
>displays `.notdef' instead of the correct glyph name for Unicode
>characters >= U+27EFC.
Yet I've not checked the contents of post table,
but my experiment on version 5.00 (MD5 is following),
with freetype-2.3.5 is same with Werner.
417a85ff314928adc67e51bb1b458f04 simsunb.ttf
I could not reproduce the bug Ding Li reported.
Regards,
mpsuzuki
- Re: [ft-devel] About the Cmap format 12, Werner LEMBERG, 2007/10/01
- Re: [ft-devel] About the Cmap format 12,
mpsuzuki <=
- Re: [ft-devel] About the Cmap format 12, Masatake YAMATO, 2007/10/03
- RE: [ft-devel] About the Cmap format 12, 丁力, 2007/10/07
- Re: [ft-devel] About the Cmap format 12, Werner LEMBERG, 2007/10/08
- Re: [ft-devel] About the Cmap format 12, George Williams, 2007/10/08
- Re: [ft-devel] About the Cmap format 12, Werner LEMBERG, 2007/10/08
- Re: [ft-devel] About the Cmap format 12, George Williams, 2007/10/08
- Re: [ft-devel] About the Cmap format 12, mpsuzuki, 2007/10/08
- Re: [ft-devel] About the Cmap format 12, George Williams, 2007/10/08
- Re: [ft-devel] About the Cmap format 14, George Williams, 2007/10/08
- Re: [ft-devel] About the Cmap format 14, Werner LEMBERG, 2007/10/10