[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [ft-devel] otvalid modules
From: |
George Williams |
Subject: |
Re: [ft-devel] otvalid modules |
Date: |
08 Aug 2007 10:42:36 -0700 |
On Tue, 2007-08-07 at 23:35, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
> I suggest a new API, probably one which can be extended in the
> (unlikely?) case the OpenType people define a new table. Can you
> provide something?
I thought of a couple of things:
A function that validated a single table (when given a face & tag)
returns: Table not understood
Table not in font
Table invalid
Table valid
or a function like the current one except it doesn't return any
tables... just goes off and validates whatever it can.
> Everything looks very good. I just wonder why some `OTV_NAME_ENTER'
> constructs are commented out. Do you want to avoid a flood of tracing
> messages?
I wasn't sure... but yes, basically I was afraid of too much output.
There's potentially one of those for every glyph in the font. Feel free
to remove the comments if you think that best.
- [ft-devel] otvalid modules, George Williams, 2007/08/07
- Re: [ft-devel] otvalid modules, Behdad Esfahbod, 2007/08/08
- Re: [ft-devel] otvalid modules, Werner LEMBERG, 2007/08/08
- Re: [ft-devel] otvalid modules,
George Williams <=
- Re: [ft-devel] otvalid modules, Werner LEMBERG, 2007/08/08
- Re: [ft-devel] otvalid modules, George Williams, 2007/08/10
- Re: [ft-devel] otvalid modules, Werner LEMBERG, 2007/08/11
- Re: [ft-devel] otvalid modules, George Williams, 2007/08/12
- Re: [ft-devel] otvalid modules, Werner LEMBERG, 2007/08/17
- Re: [ft-devel] otvalid modules, George Williams, 2007/08/17
- Re: [ft-devel] otvalid modules, Werner LEMBERG, 2007/08/17