[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[ft-devel] we don't need both FT_CONFIG_OPTION_POSTSCRIPT_NAMES and FT_C
From: |
Graham Asher |
Subject: |
[ft-devel] we don't need both FT_CONFIG_OPTION_POSTSCRIPT_NAMES and FT_CONFIG_OPTION_NO_POSTSCRIPT_NAMES |
Date: |
Wed, 1 Aug 2007 16:30:35 +0100 |
Dear FreeTypers,
here's an inconsistency we should get rid of.
ftoption.h documents and defines FT_CONFIG_OPTION_POSTSCRIPT_NAMES, but the
compilation of psmodule.c is controlled by
FT_CONFIG_OPTION_NO_POSTSCRIPT_NAMES.
I suggest changing line 30 of psmodule.c from
#ifndef FT_CONFIG_OPTION_NO_POSTSCRIPT_NAMES
to
#ifdef FT_CONFIG_OPTION_POSTSCRIPT_NAMES
which will allow the more easily understandable positive option from
ftoption.h to have an effect.
Best wishes,
Graham Asher
- [ft-devel] we don't need both FT_CONFIG_OPTION_POSTSCRIPT_NAMES and FT_CONFIG_OPTION_NO_POSTSCRIPT_NAMES,
Graham Asher <=