freetype-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[ft-devel] we don't need both FT_CONFIG_OPTION_POSTSCRIPT_NAMES and FT_C


From: Graham Asher
Subject: [ft-devel] we don't need both FT_CONFIG_OPTION_POSTSCRIPT_NAMES and FT_CONFIG_OPTION_NO_POSTSCRIPT_NAMES
Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2007 16:30:35 +0100

Dear FreeTypers,

here's an inconsistency we should get rid of.

ftoption.h documents and defines FT_CONFIG_OPTION_POSTSCRIPT_NAMES, but the
compilation of psmodule.c is controlled by
FT_CONFIG_OPTION_NO_POSTSCRIPT_NAMES.

I suggest changing line 30 of psmodule.c from

#ifndef FT_CONFIG_OPTION_NO_POSTSCRIPT_NAMES

to

#ifdef FT_CONFIG_OPTION_POSTSCRIPT_NAMES

which will allow the more easily understandable positive option from
ftoption.h to have an effect.

Best wishes,

Graham Asher






reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]