[ft-devel] we don't need both FT_CONFIG_OPTION_POSTSCRIPT_NAMES and FT_CONFIG_OPTION_NO_POSTSCRIPT_NAMES

[Graham Asher]

Dear FreeTypers,

here's an inconsistency we should get rid of.

ftoption.h documents and defines FT_CONFIG_OPTION_POSTSCRIPT_NAMES, but the
compilation of psmodule.c is controlled by
FT_CONFIG_OPTION_NO_POSTSCRIPT_NAMES.

I suggest changing line 30 of psmodule.c from

#ifndef FT_CONFIG_OPTION_NO_POSTSCRIPT_NAMES

to

#ifdef FT_CONFIG_OPTION_POSTSCRIPT_NAMES

which will allow the more easily understandable positive option from
ftoption.h to have an effect.

Best wishes,

Graham Asher