[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Devel] initial release of FTLayout/GXLayout
From: |
Masatake YAMATO |
Subject: |
Re: [Devel] initial release of FTLayout/GXLayout |
Date: |
Tue, 02 Mar 2004 17:04:30 +0900 (JST) |
Sorry to be late.
> > In such case separating the source FT2 and FTLayout will be not good.
> >
> >
> > > - different release points, so that a bug-fix in the layout
> > > engine doesn't generate a new release for the font engine
> >
> > I have had no answer yet. This is just initial release.
> >
> Well, I'm concerned about support issues. I would appreciate if we wouldn't
> have to answer every question regarding this layout engine if we can't answer
> them very well. Are you ready to become a "full" member of the FreeType team ?
> You'd be welcome !! :-)
I would like to act as FTLayout/GXLayout maintainer if the merge is done!
> > I think your approach about old ftlayout/otlayout is wrong.
> >
> Could you care to elaborate ?
There are many similar codes both in FreeType2 and old ftlayout/otlayout
because you tried to make the old ftlayout/otlayout independent from
FreeType2. As we do, I think it is better to use FreeType2 as the facility
to deevlop text layout engines.
> > No, I don't want. FTLayout/GXLayout is written from scratch.
> > So we can apply the FT2's dual-license plan. OTLayout is the main
> > target of this post. If needed, Of course, I will remove from
> > ftl tar.gz file. I have no time to estimate the time to rewrite
> > LGPL part of OTLayout.
> >
Sorry, here I took big mistakes.
> OTLayout is the main target of this post.
OTLayout is not the main target of this post.
Masatake YAMATO