[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Devel] PCF glyph numbers
|
From: |
Keith Packard |
|
Subject: |
Re: [Devel] PCF glyph numbers |
|
Date: |
Thu, 24 Apr 2003 10:38:52 -0700 |
Around 18 o'clock on Apr 24, "David Turner" wrote:
> That's most probably a bug in the PCF font driver, because the norm
> is that:
>
> - valid glyph indices always range from 0 to num_glyphs-1
>
> - glyph 0 always correspond to the "missing glyph"
Ok, that's what I thought. Xft requires that glyphs be sequentially
numbered from 0..num_glyphs-1 to operate properly. I've kludged it to
accept 0..num_glyphs to work around the PCF bug; it costs only four bytes
for each active font to do so.
-keith