[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Devel] FT 1.x updated to OpenType 1.3
From: |
Werner LEMBERG |
Subject: |
Re: [Devel] FT 1.x updated to OpenType 1.3 |
Date: |
Sat, 11 Aug 2001 01:37:19 +0200 (CEST) |
> > The difference is that in the old example, the first glyph of a
> > `diagonal group' starts on the baseline, while in the new the last
> > glyph is on the baseline.
>
> Yes I can see the difference now. But, not knowing what 'diagonal
> group' is, or what are the glyphs in a specific Arabic/Farsi
> character, I'll avoid further comment -- and continue lurking until
> I know a bit more! ;-)
`Diagonal group' is an ad-hoc term which I've invented -- I don't know
the right word, sorry. If you write like this (repeatedly from top
right to bottom left):
/ / / / /
... / / / / /
/ / / / /
/
Then I call / a diagonal group.
/
Werner
- [Devel] FT 1.x updated to OpenType 1.3, Werner LEMBERG, 2001/08/08
- Re: [Devel] FT 1.x updated to OpenType 1.3, Ali Bahar, 2001/08/08
- Re: [Devel] FT 1.x updated to OpenType 1.3, Werner LEMBERG, 2001/08/10
- Re: [Devel] FT 1.x updated to OpenType 1.3, Ali Bahar, 2001/08/10
- Re: [Devel] FT 1.x updated to OpenType 1.3,
Werner LEMBERG <=
- Re: [Devel] FT 1.x updated to OpenType 1.3, Ali Bahar, 2001/08/11
- Re: [Devel] FT 1.x updated to OpenType 1.3, Werner LEMBERG, 2001/08/19
- Re: [Devel] FT 1.x updated to OpenType 1.3, Ali Bahar, 2001/08/19
- Re: [Devel] FT 1.x updated to OpenType 1.3, Werner LEMBERG, 2001/08/20
- Re: [Devel] FT 1.x updated to OpenType 1.3, Ali Bahar, 2001/08/20