[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Devel] Re: Distiller produced PFA problems
From: |
Tom Kacvinsky |
Subject: |
[Devel] Re: Distiller produced PFA problems |
Date: |
Fri, 19 Jan 2001 16:56:55 -0500 (EST) |
I'll try on a Compaq (DEC) Tru64 UNIX box tonight (using the native C compiler).
I'll let you know what I find out... The byte sex issues aren't really an issue
for the Type 1 and CFF drivers. Each specification states that 3 and 5 byte
encoded integers (1 escape byte, and either 2 or 4 data bytes) are to be in big
endian order, and the code currently follows those guidelines...
Tom
On Fri, 19 Jan 2001, Blinn, Eric W wrote:
>
> Tom Kacvinsky wrote:
> >
> > I didn't mean to sound so snippy...
>
> No problem Tom. I didn't think you were being snippy anyway.
> And I surely didn't mean to sound like I was snippily responding
> to your snippiness! Okay, your turn. ;-)
>
> So with just your patch applied to the current CVS snapshot, you were able
> to open the font with ftview just fine? Hmm... that is interesting.
>
> Well, let me clarify one thing. I don't have CVS here, so I am working with
> the most recent freetype2-current and ft2demos-current snapshots I could
> get. It was timestamped 1/19/01 10:45 on the SourceForge FTP server. I
> should think that has to be real close if not exactly the same source tree.
> As further assurance, according to the ViewCVS web interface nothing in the
> Type 1 driver has changed in at least two weeks.
>
> Now, as for the possibility of a platform dependent issue... I'm currently
> working on Windows NT using Visual C++ 5.0 and also DEC OSF/1 using the
> native DEC compiler. On both platforms, ftview fails to open the PFA
> example I sent. Both were built with the source snapshots I mentioned above
> and your patch applied. So that does not rule it out entirely, but it
> certainly suggests that this is not a platform specific issue (at least not
> one single platform).
>
> Of course, another possibility is an endian-ness dependent issue. Intel and
> Alpha are little-endian. SPARC is big-endian. Perhaps a byte-order
> dependency?
>
> - Eric
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Tom Kacvinsky [mailto:address@hidden
> > Sent: Friday, January 19, 2001 8:03 PM
> > To: address@hidden
> > Subject: [Devel] Re: Distiller produced PFA problems
> >
> >
> > Hey...
> >
> > I didn't mean to sound so snippy... What I was after is that
> > I did not
> > encounter the errors you are seeing. Which is strange,
> > because we are using the
> > same code base, and the same font. Which platform are you
> > working on? Maybe
> > that is the issue? I am using sun-sparc-solaris-2.7,
> > compiled with gcc 2.95.2.
> >
> > Tom
> >
> > On Fri, 19 Jan 2001, Blinn, Eric W wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > Tom Kacvinsky wrote:
> > > >
> > > > The font you sent me has a CharStrings array! Did you
> > > > send me the wrong font? I am working with the latest CVS
> > > > version, so if you are using an earlier version of the code,
> > > > that might be the cause of the problem...
> > >
> > > Hey Tom,
> > >
> > > No. You have the right font and I patched the right
> > version. The problem
> > > is related to the point I was making in the e-mail I sent
> > with the font
> > > attached ...
> > >
> > > The subrs array is not all that is missing here. The font
> > does not have a
> > > charstrings array either, or at least one is not loaded by
> > the time we get
> > > to T1_Open_Face(). This doesn't satisfy T1_Open_Face().
> > Immediately after
> > > the check for a subrs array a similar check is made for a
> > charstrings array.
> > > It is not present and so error still gets set to
> > T1_Err_Invalid_File_Format
> > > and eventually propagates up to a
> > FT_Err_Invalid_File_Format coming out of
> > > FT_New_Face().
> > >
> > > - Eric
> > >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Devel mailing list
> > address@hidden
> > http://www.freetype.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
> >
>
- Re: [Devel] Re: Distiller produced PFA problems, (continued)
RE: [Devel] Re: Distiller produced PFA problems, Blinn, Eric W, 2001/01/19
RE: [Devel] Re: Distiller produced PFA problems, Blinn, Eric W, 2001/01/19
RE: [Devel] Re: Distiller produced PFA problems, Blinn, Eric W, 2001/01/19
- [Devel] Re: Distiller produced PFA problems,
Tom Kacvinsky <=
RE: [Devel] Re: Distiller produced PFA problems, Blinn, Eric W, 2001/01/22
RE: [Devel] Re: Distiller produced PFA problems, Blinn, Eric W, 2001/01/23