[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: FT2 design question
From: |
Just van Rossum |
Subject: |
Re: FT2 design question |
Date: |
Sat, 26 Feb 2000 19:50:14 +0100 |
At 6:07 PM +0000 26-02-2000, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
>The TeXbook, p.19, Exercise 5.1.
Found it, thanks. He says "sometimes" and "rare". That doesn't make it a
rule, though.
>Look into german.sty -- the command to suppress a ligature inserts a
>bit white space to improve appearance: `Auf"|lage'. IMHO, it is an
>improvement.
Maybe, I still think it's unneccesary... We disagree. That's fine ;-)
>> I don't know about bac-ken, but c-k *used* to be possible... Glad it
>> isn't anymore, though.
>
>Where have you seen this? It is definitely bad style. Can you give
>an example?
I'll have to ask an expert friend. I'll let you know if I get an answer.
Just
- FT2 design question, Just van Rossum, 2000/02/25
- Re: FT2 design question, David Turner, 2000/02/25
- Re: FT2 design question, Stefan Seefeld, 2000/02/25
- Re: FT2 design question, David Turner, 2000/02/25
- Re: FT2 design question, Stefan Seefeld, 2000/02/25
- Re: FT2 design question, Werner LEMBERG, 2000/02/26
- Re: FT2 design question, Just van Rossum, 2000/02/26
- Re: FT2 design question, Werner LEMBERG, 2000/02/26
- Re: FT2 design question, Just van Rossum, 2000/02/26
- Re: FT2 design question, Werner LEMBERG, 2000/02/26
- Re: FT2 design question,
Just van Rossum <=
- Re: FT2 design question, Pavel Kankovsky, 2000/02/27
- Re: FT2 design question, Stefan Seefeld, 2000/02/28
- Re: FT2 design question, Werner LEMBERG, 2000/02/29
- Re: FT2 design question, Stefan Seefeld, 2000/02/29
- Re: FT2 design question, Werner LEMBERG, 2000/02/29
- Re: FT2 design question, David Turner, 2000/02/28
- Re: FT2 design question, Stefan Seefeld, 2000/02/28
Re: FT2 design question, Just van Rossum, 2000/02/25