Re: [Freepooma-devel] [PATCH] PathScale EKOPath compiler support

[Bryan O'Sullivan]

On Thu, 2005-03-17 at 09:33 +0100, Richard Guenther wrote:

> Well in all the shipped benchmarks you'll get output like
> (BlitzLoops):

> where the ultimate goal is to have CppTran and PoomaII numbers
> be equal or better (higher - these are sort of MFLOPs) than
> the C and C restrict numbers.  Here we assume that the compilers
> are already very good at optimizing the C code, which is usually
> true.

Thanks for the descriptions.  I'll take a look and see what numbers we
get.  What kind of hardware did you get those numbers on, by the way?
We have a variety of stuff here, so I can try to reproduce your numbers.

        <b

-- 
Bryan O'Sullivan <address@hidden>