Hi!
On Friday, April 24, 2009, Conrad Berhörster wrote:
Hello Pedro,
On Thursday 23 April 2009 21:04:06 Josh Green wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-04-20 at 23:38 +0200, Pedro Lopez-Cabanillas wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I've committed some changes to the developer documentation:
> > http://fluidsynth.resonance.org/trac/changeset/176
> >
> > There is a new document source "fluidsynth-v11-devdoc.txt" formatted
> > for Doxygen, and an updated Doxyfile specifications to process this new
> > file along with the library headers and sources. The resulting
> > documentation is a bundle of the function references with a main page
> > based on the old docbook document "fluidsynth-v10-devdoc.xml", with
> > some additions taken from another document found at
> > http://www.toncat.de/fluidsynth/ and some more text by myself.
thanks for the work, Maybe you have a better place to host the document. If
not, I can host it further, if you want to.
> This all sounds great! I got an email back from Peter Hanappe
> confirming that we can change the license to whatever seems appropriate.
> I'm not certain what would be the best though. Any suggestions?
LGPL would be fine.
sizu c~
The suggestion for Debian compliance was CC-BY-SA 3.0, and I rather like it.
It is a copyleft license in the spirit of the GPL/LGPL.
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/
If nobody objects, I would change the license text to this one. About hosting
the draft documents for public review before the next release, I can do it on
my personal website in SourceForge. Thanks for your offer, you can also host
a copy if you want of course.
Regards,
Pedro