Hey Julien,
Just some more clarity on licenses.. First, FluidSynth is under the
LGPL. Indeed the GPL does not forbid incorporation in a commercial
product, as long as the source code is not linked or included directly
in another program (i.e., it is used as a stand alone application).
The
LPGL on the other hand permits linking as a shared library. At any
rate, I don't think we should turn the FluidSynth list into a
discussion
on licenses, beyond the scope of FluidSynth ;) As a side note
though, I
think originally LinuxSampler had an additional custom clause in its
license that forbid any sort of commercial use (perhaps this is no
longer the case?). I remember some controversy over this, since that
could indeed also forbid distribution by Linux distribution companies.
Since Benno is a copyright holder of the software, he has the right to
re-license its use, to be used in a commercial application.
Best regards,
Josh
On Tue, 2008-09-30 at 18:42 +0200, Julien Claassen wrote:
Hi!
I think fluidsynth is GPL as well. and if I'm not wrong - having
had and
heard endless discussions on linux audio users and developers
mailinglists -
GPL does not forbid incorporation in a commercial product. that why
LinuxSampler isn't exactly GPL, because Benno Senona has his own
commercial
product, in which he incorporates LinuxSampler. So this should be
no problem.
Kindest regards
Julien
--------
Music was my first love and it will be my last (John Miles)
======== FIND MY WEB-PROJECT AT: ========
http://ltsb.sourceforge.net
the Linux TextBased Studio guide
======= AND MY PERSONAL PAGES AT: =======
http://www.juliencoder.de
_______________________________________________
fluid-dev mailing list
address@hidden
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/fluid-dev