[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [fluid-dev] [PATCH] Effect level clip
From: |
David Hilvert |
Subject: |
Re: [fluid-dev] [PATCH] Effect level clip |
Date: |
Mon, 17 Sep 2007 17:42:59 -0500 |
On Mon, 17 Sep 2007 13:09:07 -0700
Josh Green <address@hidden> wrote:
> return rev->wet / scalewet;
>
> Probably could even remove the rev->level field at that point. This
> seems like the right way to do things. Anyone got any objections or
> comments on this?
If the 'wet' code is uncommented, and the effect level clip patch is reverted,
does the gain control work as expected? If so, the benefit of the effect level
clip patch is unclear; if not, the benefit of the commented code is unclear.
If the goal is solely to keep one of level and wet as an effect gain control,
the answer should probably depend on which one works better for this. OTOH,
it's possible that wet is doing something else useful; could it be renamed?
- Re: [fluid-dev] [PATCH] Effect level clip, Josh Green, 2007/09/02
- Re: [fluid-dev] [PATCH] Effect level clip, David Hilvert, 2007/09/03
- Re: [fluid-dev] [PATCH] Effect level clip, Josh Green, 2007/09/17
- Re: [fluid-dev] [PATCH] Effect level clip, David Hilvert, 2007/09/17
- Re: [fluid-dev] [PATCH] Effect level clip, Josh Green, 2007/09/17
- Re: [fluid-dev] [PATCH] Effect level clip, Rui Nuno Capela, 2007/09/17
- Re: [fluid-dev] [PATCH] Effect level clip, Josh Green, 2007/09/17
- Re: [fluid-dev] [PATCH] Effect level clip,
David Hilvert <=
- Re: [fluid-dev] [PATCH] Effect level clip, Josh Green, 2007/09/17
- Re: [fluid-dev] [PATCH] Effect level clip, David Hilvert, 2007/09/17
- Re: [fluid-dev] [PATCH] Effect level clip, Josh Green, 2007/09/17
- Re: [fluid-dev] [PATCH] Effect level clip, David Hilvert, 2007/09/17
- Re: [fluid-dev] [PATCH] Effect level clip, David Hilvert, 2007/09/17
- Message not available
- Re: [fluid-dev] [PATCH] Effect level clip, Rui Nuno Capela, 2007/09/17