[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Fkt-devel] towards fxt 0.2.2

From: François Trahay
Subject: Re: [Fkt-devel] towards fxt 0.2.2
Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2011 14:12:14 +0100
User-agent: KMail/1.13.5 (Linux/2.6.37-2-amd64; KDE/4.4.5; x86_64; ; )

On Thursday 10 March 2011 20:49:50 Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Cédric Augonnet, le Thu 10 Mar 2011 19:30:16 +0100, a écrit :
> > On 10/03/2011 13:31, François Trahay wrote:
> > >I have committed a few things in fxt that fix the support for Mac OS X
> > >and that
> > >record the thread id (before that, it was done only for Marcel).
> > >Since we need an up to date version of fxt in eztrace (we need the
> > >recording
> > >of thread id at least), it would be nice to release a new version of fxt
> > >so that we can publish a new eztrace release.
> > >Is it possible to release fxt 0.2.2 ?
> Sure.
> > Does this add a syscall for each trace ?
> It seems so. That's quite expensive. Can't eztrace explicitly request it
> at runtime?

For now, it is requested during fxt configuration, but i can request it at 
runtime. It could be asked when fut_setup is called, but this would add a 
parameter to this function and break API compatilibity.

So I think, the best thing to do is to implement functions like 
fut_enable_tid_logging and fut_disable_tid_logging.

> > Otherwise if we make a release, we should think of minor changes like
> > removing the fprintf from the parsing functions (it's getting really
> > annoying).
> Which ones? I've only found a "\n" from names.c
> Samuel

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]