|
From: | tps12 |
Subject: | Re: [Fgs-bs] F*ETURE request |
Date: | Wed, 06 Aug 2003 14:21:35 -0400 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.3a) Gecko/20021212 |
Desired Username wrote:
1) How would access be controlled? The gamers? Presumably everyone would be able to read the"official" commentary. And the officials able to read the questions in the temp? No, questions about that game should be visible in the SGF for later downloading. This sounds like the shout/gshout distinction. Hard to enforce.
What the heck is gshout? Anyway, point taken.
3) This reminds me. Someone who is censored by another user shouldn't be able to comment in that person's games, either.
Okay, so censor lists need to be stored server-side. This relates to buddy lists...clients should let censor lists stay private, i.e., not be stored on or ever sent to the server. Which means you can *only* ban certain kibitzers if you're willing to let the Evil Admins know about it. Also, there's an issue of conflict. If A and B play a game, and A has censored B's mentor C, is it fair to prevent C from commenting on the game of his pupil?
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |