[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Fab-user] I bet it would be pretty to do transaction semantics but it s
From: |
Matthew Wilson |
Subject: |
[Fab-user] I bet it would be pretty to do transaction semantics but it sure would be nice |
Date: |
Thu, 23 Jul 2009 16:34:50 -0400 |
There's a possibility that halfway through a long set of tasks,
something might go wrong. In a database, I can use some kind of
rollback so that the system is in a coherent state.
I don't see how I could do something like this with fabric (I'm not
saying this is fabric's fault).
How are other people handling error situations? It seems like a run
job immediately aborts. Would it make sense to support a callback
that executes on failure?
Matt
--
Matthew Wilson
address@hidden
http://tplus1.com
- [Fab-user] I bet it would be pretty to do transaction semantics but it sure would be nice,
Matthew Wilson <=