[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [emacs-wiki-discuss] planner-multi and planner-timeclock-summary
From: |
Dryice Liu |
Subject: |
Re: [emacs-wiki-discuss] planner-multi and planner-timeclock-summary |
Date: |
Sat, 02 Jul 2005 08:48:57 +0800 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/23.0.0 (berkeley-unix) |
Sacha Chua <address@hidden> wrote:
> Chris Parsons <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> I'm currently taking a hiatus from planner-mode based on the need to
>> be more portable whilst I try and integrate GTD into my life. Also,
>> the fact that planner-multi and planner-timeclock-summary don't work
>> together well, and I don't have time to fix it, currently prevent me
>> from using it.
>
> Wish, command, yadayada. I've just tweaked the planner-multi +
> planner-timeclock + planner-timeclock-summary interaction.
> planner-timeclock now saves the additional plans and
> planner-timeclock-summary defaults to reporting things under the first
> plan. You can use planner-timeclock-task-plan-as-list to get a list of
> multiple projects; with some tweaking, you can get the tasks reported
> under multiple headings. Would that be a good idea?
If we get the tasks reported under multiple headings, there will be a
problem counting the "Ratio" column, depending on how we count the
"total time":
If we count the duration of the "multiple" task several times, the
ration won't be quite accurate. And if someone use multiple tasks a
lot, he/she may work more than 24 hours a day :)
And if we count the duration of the "multiple" task only once, if
someone add all the "ratio" by hand, he/she will find it be more than
100%.
Any better idea? Between these two I think the second one do "less
harm".
--
Dryice @ http://dryice.3322.org
Please avoid sending me Word or PowerPoint attachments.
See http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/sylvester-response.html
pgpYCaymksckk.pgp
Description: PGP signature