[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[emacs-wiki-discuss] Re: Is emacs-wiki doomed?
From: |
Michael Olson |
Subject: |
[emacs-wiki-discuss] Re: Is emacs-wiki doomed? |
Date: |
Fri, 01 Jul 2005 16:37:31 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
"Jose A. Ortega Ruiz" <address@hidden> writes:
> Hi. I'm using planner, emacs-wiki and emacs-wiki-journal extensively
> and with all the latest talk about Muse i was wondering: should I
> switch? I've read the Muse manual and I don't really need to switch:
> I am quite happy with emacs-wiki and I feel lazy... What's your
> advice?
In nearly every way, Muse is superior to emacs-wiki. I've tried to
put together an objective analysis of the benefits and disincentives
for switching to Muse at
http://www.emacswiki.org/cgi-bin/wiki/MuseMode.
Of course, I'll keep supporting both.
--
Michael Olson -- FSF Associate Member #652 -- http://www.mwolson.org/
Interests: anime, Debian, XHTML, wiki, Emacs Lisp
/` |\ | | | IRC: mwolson on freenode.net: #hcoop, #muse, #pulug
|_] | \| |_| Jabber: mwolson_at_hcoop.net
pgp3Fa6eLwwdC.pgp
Description: PGP signature