[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: (*) -> 1
From: |
Emanuel Berg |
Subject: |
Re: (*) -> 1 |
Date: |
Sun, 22 Jan 2023 11:56:43 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) |
Jean Louis wrote:
>>> In my book, it is useful to have mathematically sound
>>> behavior by default. If you have a reason to handle some
>>> edge-cases differently in some application (which is
>>> totally possible!), then define your own function which
>>> does what you wish.
>>
>> Your book? Actually I think a lot of people have it.
>
> Question is resolved.
>
> I have re-defined (*) → 1 to give me at least something
> useful:
>
> (defun * ()
> "sex")
>
> (*) → "sex"
The No. 1 thing to some people ...
--
underground experts united
https://dataswamp.org/~incal
- Re: (*) -> 1, Jean Louis, 2023/01/19
- Re: (*) -> 1, Jean Louis, 2023/01/19
- Re: (*) -> 1, Jean Louis, 2023/01/20
- Re: (*) -> 1, Tassilo Horn, 2023/01/20
- Re: (*) -> 1, Jean Louis, 2023/01/20
- Re: (*) -> 1, Tassilo Horn, 2023/01/20
- Re: (*) -> 1, Jean Louis, 2023/01/21
- Re: (*) -> 1, Tassilo Horn, 2023/01/21
- Re: (*) -> 1, Emanuel Berg, 2023/01/22
- Re: (*) -> 1, Jean Louis, 2023/01/22
- Re: (*) -> 1,
Emanuel Berg <=
- RE: [External] : Re: (*) -> 1, Drew Adams, 2023/01/22
- Re: (*) -> 1, Akib Azmain Turja, 2023/01/22
- Re: (*) -> 1, Emanuel Berg, 2023/01/22
- Re: (*) -> 1, Jean Louis, 2023/01/23
- Re: (*) -> 1, Jean Louis, 2023/01/23
- Re: (*) -> 1, Emanuel Berg, 2023/01/23