[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: cp932, cp949, c950 definitions
From: |
Jason Rumney |
Subject: |
Re: cp932, cp949, c950 definitions |
Date: |
Sat, 12 Jun 2004 23:02:49 +0900 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110002 (No Gnus v0.2) Emacs/21.3.50 (windows-nt) |
Dave Love <address@hidden> writes:
>> I checked Korean, which is the one I am most worried about since
>> it includes extra precomposed Hangeul, but the extra characters are
>> all in the gap [0x3400, 0xdfff] that is not covered by current Emacs.
>
> The gap in what? The mule-unicode charsets? If so, I wasn't
> expecting those to help.
>
> I was hoping that the characters not in ksc5601 might be in the
> CNS sets, for instance.
That might be the case for the extra characters in cp950 and
cp932. But the extra characters in cp949 are precomposed Hangeul,
a phonetic alphabet used only in Korea and unlikely to be covered in
CNS.
> If they're composed versions of things in
> ksc5601, presumably they could be dealt with by post-read and
> pre-write conversions operating with the compositions.
Probably, but its beyond my understanding.
- cp932, cp949, c950 definitions, Dave Love, 2004/06/04
- Re: cp932, cp949, c950 definitions, Jason Rumney, 2004/06/04
- Re: cp932, cp949, c950 definitions, Dave Love, 2004/06/08
- Re: cp932, cp949, c950 definitions, Jason Rumney, 2004/06/08
- Re: cp932, cp949, c950 definitions, Dave Love, 2004/06/11
- Re: cp932, cp949, c950 definitions,
Jason Rumney <=
- Re: cp932, cp949, c950 definitions, Dave Love, 2004/06/21
- Re: cp932, cp949, c950 definitions, Jason Rumney, 2004/06/21
- Re: cp932, cp949, c950 definitions, Richard Stallman, 2004/06/22