[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: bad UI defaults
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: bad UI defaults |
Date: |
Sun, 24 Aug 2003 23:30:32 -0400 |
> * The changed behaviour of the blinking cursor -- solid and empty
> box, rather than solid and absent -- makes it hard to read the
> character under the cursor, at least with the font I use
> (lucidatypewriter-medium-*-normal-*-*-120).
My idea here was to make it easier to see the cursor.
If people generally don't like it, then let's undo the change.
> * The smaller (one-pixel?) width of the outlines of boxes and arrows
> in the menus means they pretty well fade away on my 1280×1024
> display.
Same for me, same resolution, wearing glasses. If I'm not looking
very carefully, I don't see the arrows in the menu at all. I gather
this is to make Emacs integrate better with some Gnome style, but I
can't say I like it :).
I am not sure what change this refers to. I don't think it was a
change that I made.
- Re: bad UI defaults, Gerd Moellmann, 2003/08/24
- Re: bad UI defaults,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: bad UI defaults, Nick Roberts, 2003/08/25
- Re: bad UI defaults, Gerd Moellmann, 2003/08/25
- Re: bad UI defaults, Richard Stallman, 2003/08/27
- Re: bad UI defaults, Gerd Moellmann, 2003/08/27
- Re: bad UI defaults, Kim F. Storm, 2003/08/27
- Re: bad UI defaults, Kim F. Storm, 2003/08/27