|
From: | No Wayman |
Subject: | Re: [POLL] Naming of "export features" |
Date: | Thu, 23 Feb 2023 10:31:24 -0500 |
User-agent: | mu4e 1.9.21; emacs 30.0.50 |
Ihor Radchenko <yantar92@posteo.net> writes:I am looking at the concept again, and I feel that we may be missing some flexibility here. I do not like the fact that each feature can onlyhave a simple implementation within specific backend.
Agreed
What I have in mind is an ability to parametrize the transcoders
This seems like a step in the right direction.
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |