[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: We have asynchronous sessions, why have anything else?
From: |
Ihor Radchenko |
Subject: |
Re: We have asynchronous sessions, why have anything else? |
Date: |
Mon, 27 Jun 2022 17:57:44 +0800 |
Ivar Fredholm <freddyholms@protonmail.com> writes:
> I believe the two could be unified if we expand the functionality of
> the async filter to look for 'exception' tags. Then each language
> implementation must only put the org-babel src block in a try-except
> type construction and put the error message into the except block.
I am not even sure if all the babel backends support try-except.
Think about ob-gnuplot or, say, ob-latex.
Best,
Ihor
- We have asynchronous sessions, why have anything else?, Ivar Fredholm, 2022/06/25
- Re: We have asynchronous sessions, why have anything else?, Ihor Radchenko, 2022/06/25
- Re: We have asynchronous sessions, why have anything else?, Ivar Fredholm, 2022/06/26
- Re: We have asynchronous sessions, why have anything else?,
Ihor Radchenko <=
- Re: We have asynchronous sessions, why have anything else?, Tom Gillespie, 2022/06/27
- Re: We have asynchronous sessions, why have anything else?, Tim Cross, 2022/06/27
- Re: We have asynchronous sessions, why have anything else?, John Kitchin, 2022/06/27