[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: C-SPC works; C-u C-SPC doesn't. How could be?
From: |
Ihor Radchenko |
Subject: |
Re: C-SPC works; C-u C-SPC doesn't. How could be? |
Date: |
Sat, 25 Jun 2022 08:53:59 +0800 |
Ypo <ypuntot@gmail.com> writes:
> Yes, I tried your assertion for bug-hunter, but it didn't work.
>
> (unless (eq 'universal-argument (keymap-lookup global-map "C-u"))
> (error "C-u has been redefined"))
You can also bisect interactively instead of using assertion.
Note that your assertion is not expected to catch anything considering
that the problem is only present inside .org files.
Best,
Ihor
- C-SPC works; C-u C-SPC doesn't. How could be?, Ypo, 2022/06/24
- Re: C-SPC works; C-u C-SPC doesn't. How could be?, Greg Minshall, 2022/06/24
- Re: C-SPC works; C-u C-SPC doesn't. How could be?, Bruno Barbier, 2022/06/24
- Message not available
- Re: C-SPC works; C-u C-SPC doesn't. How could be?, Bruno Barbier, 2022/06/25
- Message not available
- Re: C-SPC works; C-u C-SPC doesn't. How could be?, Ypo, 2022/06/26
- Re: C-SPC works; C-u C-SPC doesn't. How could be?, Bruno Barbier, 2022/06/26
- Message not available
- Re: C-SPC works; C-u C-SPC doesn't. How could be?, Ypo, 2022/06/26
- Re: C-SPC works; C-u C-SPC doesn't. How could be?, Tim Cross, 2022/06/26