[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Ambiguity in commit message conventions for org
From: |
Robert Pluim |
Subject: |
Re: Ambiguity in commit message conventions for org |
Date: |
Fri, 10 Jun 2022 18:02:09 +0200 |
>>>>> On Fri, 10 Jun 2022 23:11:09 +0800, Ihor Radchenko <yantar92@gmail.com>
>>>>> said:
Ihor> Robert Pluim <rpluim@gmail.com> writes:
Ihor> See https://orgmode.org/worg/org-contribute.html
>>
>> Those conventions are slightly different than Emacs', with one point
>> of ambiguity. They say
>> ...
>>
>> The summary line contains the 'lisp' directory, but the ChangeLog entry
>> doesnʼt, and in the example just after itʼs the other way around:
Ihor> You are right. The example is indeed a bit confusing. The main
Ihor> difference between Emacs' and Org's converntions is in summary line.
We
Ihor> are less formal about and prefer shorter summaries. You can drop the
Ihor> directory or even file name if it saves space and does not create
Ihor> amiguity.
Emacs convention is to not mention the file name in the summary,
unless itʼs a one-file change, in which case you put the filename with
'* ' prepended (although some contributors prefer not to do that).
I went for 'dir/filename' in the summary, since Iʼm lazy and can copy
that from the ChangeLog commit message :-)
Robert
--
- Re: Timestamp with repeater interval AND END DATE?, Robert Pluim, 2022/06/10
- Re: Timestamp with repeater interval AND END DATE?, Angel de Vicente, 2022/06/10
- Re: Timestamp with repeater interval AND END DATE?, Robert Pluim, 2022/06/10
- Re: Timestamp with repeater interval AND END DATE?, Ihor Radchenko, 2022/06/10
- Re: Timestamp with repeater interval AND END DATE?, Robert Pluim, 2022/06/10
- Re: Timestamp with repeater interval AND END DATE?, Ihor Radchenko, 2022/06/10
- Re: Timestamp with repeater interval AND END DATE?, Robert Pluim, 2022/06/10
- Re: Timestamp with repeater interval AND END DATE?, Ihor Radchenko, 2022/06/11
- Ambiguity in commit message conventions for org, Robert Pluim, 2022/06/10
- Re: Ambiguity in commit message conventions for org, Ihor Radchenko, 2022/06/10
- Re: Ambiguity in commit message conventions for org,
Robert Pluim <=