[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: should a BIBLIOGRAPHY keyword supercede org-cite-global-bibliography
Re: should a BIBLIOGRAPHY keyword supercede org-cite-global-bibliography?
Mon, 19 Jul 2021 21:42:38 -0400
As Emmenuel pointed out, we missed that Nicolas already thought of
this, and you can do this:
With that, there's no problem, and lots of flexibility.
On Mon, Jul 19, 2021 at 8:53 PM Thomas S. Dye <email@example.com> wrote:
> I used to have a global bibliography that my employees all used.
> Every project also had a local bibliography for citations that
> didn't appear in the global bibliography. At the end of a
> project, after the editor had cleaned up the local bibliography,
> I'd merge it with the global bibliography using a utility called
> Vikas Rawal <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> >> It seems like that should not be the case, i.e. if you define
> >> BIBLIOGRAPHY
> >> keywords it means you do not want to use the ones
> >> in org-cite-global-bibliography. Is there a scenario where the
> >> union of those
> >> makes sense?
> > I second this. The local bibliographies should supercede the
> > global.
> > Vikas
> Thomas S. Dye