[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: should a BIBLIOGRAPHY keyword supercede org-cite-global-bibliography

From: Bruce D'Arcus
Subject: Re: should a BIBLIOGRAPHY keyword supercede org-cite-global-bibliography?
Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2021 13:40:48 -0400

Yes, you're right Emmanuel.

I guess this goes back to my file type/extension issue then.

I do expect this to be a non-issue in time though, as related packages
update to fully support all three common input formats.

On Mon, Jul 19, 2021 at 1:29 PM CHARPENTIER Emmanuel
<emmanuel.charpentier@aphp.fr> wrote:
> > It seems like that should not be the case, i.e. if you define
> > BIBLIOGRAPHY keywords it means you do not want to use the ones in
> > org-cite-global-bibliography. Is there a scenario where the union of
> > those makes sense?
> Yes indeed: you may have
>   - A library for background issues (e. g. methodology)
>   - A (or several) subject matter-specific library (e. g. a
>     subdiscipline, a method, etc...)
>   - A library specific to the question you are discussing (e. g.
>     results of a bibliographic search specific to your question).
> The first one is a perfect target for org-cite-global-bibliography. The
> last one is of course a target for #+BIBLIOGRAPHY ; I'd tend to let the
> subject matter library as a file-specific #+BIBLIOGRAPHY (my subject
> matters tend to vary...), but this depends on your field.
> You may also think of this typology as books, reviews and research
> papers respectively...
> HTH,
> --
> Emmanuel Charpentier

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]