emacs-orgmode
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [BUG] org-goto slows down org-set-property


From: Ihor Radchenko
Subject: Re: [BUG] org-goto slows down org-set-property
Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2021 00:00:08 +0800

Maxim Nikulin <manikulin@gmail.com> writes:

> Ihor, did you get that numbers using emacs -Q? If not, I suspect you may 
> have twice more markers in the buffer than `org-refile-get-targets' 
> usually generates. If my guess is correct it may be necessary to file a 
> bug that org-ql or some other package abuses markers by generation to 
> much of them.

With emacs -Q things are twice better, though still not good enough:

#+RESULTS[b9f5ebaf91a21d8da95b8840c70f6d9aeb2ab3ae]:
| 9.4.4                  |                    |    |                    |
| nm-tst                 |  5.572397445999999 | 38 | 1.0039881250000002 |
| org-refile-get-targets |       13.029634993 | 53 | 1.3204672779999997 |
| nm-tst                 | 24.142289434000002 | 25 | 0.7106094290000002 |
| org-refile-cache-clear |         0.00502349 |  0 |                0.0 |
| nm-tst                 |        5.043277087 | 38 | 0.8292470489999997 |

org-ql might be one of the reasons of slowdown. Without it, the nm-tst
after clearing the cache is slightly faster (was 13 sec):

#+RESULTS[e5ee2bee7b348265a19834d5ca2697618a9bf261]:
| 9.4.6                  |                   |    |                    |
| nm-tst                 |      10.106726732 | 34 | 3.0993166650000004 |
| org-refile-get-targets | 5.721277742000001 | 19 | 1.6862241439999996 |
| nm-tst                 |      22.056917422 | 33 |  3.000191514999999 |
| org-refile-cache-clear |       0.001498722 |  0 |                0.0 |
| nm-tst                 |      10.066160733 | 34 |        3.203417302 |

However, markers are also created by agendas for example. The last
result is also on fresh Emacs. Fresh Emacs tends to be faster in general.

Do you know a good way to find out all the markers associated with a buffer?

> P.S. Maybe generating of custom IDs automatically is a viable idea. 
> Before I have not considered such variant believing that they would be 
> noticeably longer and would have weaker associations.

Some examples of autogenerated IDs using bibtex-autokey:
du-2021-recen-studies-in-mechan-proper-e4d
Youtube-veritasium-2021-you-cant-prove-every-thats-true-346
schuh-2005-quant-insig-into-disloc-nucleat-a1d
Karl-Voit-voit-2020-draft-workf-advan-projec-manag

You can judge for yourself if it is too long or not. Also, the length
can be customised as described in bibtex-generate-autokey docstring.

Best,
Ihor



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]