[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: A formal grammar for Org
From: |
David Masterson |
Subject: |
Re: A formal grammar for Org |
Date: |
Wed, 02 Jun 2021 19:36:42 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux) |
Jakob Schöttl <jschoett@gmail.com> writes:
> Am 02.06.21 um 06:00 schrieb David Masterson:
>> Jakob Schöttl <jschoett@gmail.com> writes:
>>
>>> Am 01.06.21 um 11:53 schrieb Tom Gillespie:
>>>>> We have a pretty similar project, org-parser[1]. It's also written
>>>>> in a Lisp dialect, Clojure, but it uses instaparse instead of brag
>>>>> as parser library.
>>>> https://github.com/tgbugs/laundry/tree/next#similar-projects I managed
>>>> to get it into my README as a reminder to myself to have a thorough
>>>> look at it, but have been occupied with other work since then.
>>> Thanks, I'll also set a link in our README to related work.
>> Have either (or both) of you looked at BeOrg (http://beorg.app)? This
>> is an (iOS) app that implements task management from Org files by
>> reading and updating the Org file structure. I would assume it uses a
>> parser to breakdown the Org file structure and rebuild it later. That
>> is what I see your parsers becoming.
> I haven't tried BeOrg myself, but it's proprietary and we have an open
> source, platform-independent alternative with Organice. See also
> https://github.com/200ok-ch/organice#beorg
>
> org-parser is also open source and will finally replace Organice's
> somewhat hacky Parser as a library.
Nice (no pun intended)
--
David Masterson