[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH] may we focus on readability?
|
From: |
tomas |
|
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH] may we focus on readability? |
|
Date: |
Sun, 14 Jun 2020 19:24:47 +0200 |
|
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Sun, Jun 14, 2020 at 11:47:31AM -0500, Mario Frasca wrote:
> I'm rewriting a complicated construction where there's an equality
> test on the length of the list of non matching elements, with a
> simpler cl-some invocation. The replacing code is self explanatory.
Isn't `seq-some' equivalent? (in this case, at least; cl-some is
willing to take more than one sequence).
Cheers
-- t
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature