[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [O] [RFC] Dog food, anyone?
From: |
Phillip Lord |
Subject: |
Re: [O] [RFC] Dog food, anyone? |
Date: |
Thu, 21 Dec 2017 12:58:20 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.0.90 (gnu/linux) |
Nicolas Goaziou <address@hidden> writes:
> Hello,
>
> The task started by Thomas S. Dye a couple years ago is now complete.
> The "manual.org" file in "contrib/" directory is an up-to-date,
> sometimes enhanced, version of the Org manual. Org can now eat its own
> dog food.
>
> During the process, I had to re-organize some parts of the manual (e.g.,
> "Working with source code" section, the concept index...) and improve
> the "texinfo" export back-end, which was not up to the task when Thomas
> started it.
Good stuff!
My question about this and your experiences with ox-texinfo, is would it
be possible to integrate this into a workflow where a manual was
converted piece-meal.
So, if a texinfo manual was multi-part (like the Emacs manual for
instance), it could be converted one file at a time, rather than having
to do the whole lot.
Phil
- Re: [O] [RFC] Dog food, anyone?, (continued)
Re: [O] [RFC] Dog food, anyone?, Jonathan Leech-Pepin, 2017/12/19
Message not available
- Re: [O] [RFC] Dog food, anyone?,
Phillip Lord <=
- Re: [O] [RFC] Dog food, anyone?, Nicolas Goaziou, 2017/12/21
- Re: [O] [RFC] Dog food, anyone?, Phillip Lord, 2017/12/21
- Re: [O] [RFC] Dog food, anyone?, Nicolas Goaziou, 2017/12/21
- Message not available
- Re: [O] [RFC] Dog food, anyone?, Phillip Lord, 2017/12/21
- Re: [O] [RFC] Dog food, anyone?, Nicolas Goaziou, 2017/12/22
Re: [O] [RFC] Dog food, anyone?, Yasushi SHOJI, 2017/12/23