[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [O] [RFC] Dog food, anyone?
From: |
Thomas S. Dye |
Subject: |
Re: [O] [RFC] Dog food, anyone? |
Date: |
Sun, 17 Dec 2017 15:13:31 -1000 |
User-agent: |
mu4e 0.9.17; emacs 25.3.1 |
Aloha Adrian,
Adrian Bradd writes:
>
> I support the move to manual.org. If there are concerns about the
> quality of the manual.org file and its exported .texi manual that
> prevent it from becoming the master source one could ask contributors to
> add information to both the .texi and .org file until the final
> conversion is made. At the very least this would prevent an individual
> from taking all the load.
>
> Was there resistance to the move to manual.org previously? Or was the
> issue one of apathy?
I don't know exactly. I think there were legitimate concerns at the
time that manual.org required more work to produce a standard org.texi,
and some doubt whether it would indeed be possible.
I don't think apathy was a factor. IIRC, there was a lot of support for
the idea, including Carsten's hope that Org mode could "eat it's own dog
food."
All the best,
Tom
--
Thomas S. Dye
http://www.tsdye.com
- [O] [RFC] Dog food, anyone?, Nicolas Goaziou, 2017/12/17
- Re: [O] [RFC] Dog food, anyone?, Vikas Rawal, 2017/12/17
- Re: [O] [RFC] Dog food, anyone?, Thomas S. Dye, 2017/12/17
- Re: [O] [RFC] Dog food, anyone?, Nicolas Goaziou, 2017/12/17
- Re: [O] [RFC] Dog food, anyone?, Nicolas Goaziou, 2017/12/17
- Re: [O] [RFC] Dog food, anyone?, Vikas Rawal, 2017/12/17
- Re: [O] [RFC] Dog food, anyone?, Thomas S. Dye, 2017/12/17
Re: [O] [RFC] Dog food, anyone?, Kaushal Modi, 2017/12/17
[O] [RFC] Official Org manual in Org! (Was: Dog food, anyone?), Kaushal Modi, 2017/12/17
Re: [O] [RFC] Dog food, anyone?, Eric Abrahamsen, 2017/12/17
Re: [O] [RFC] Dog food, anyone?, Thomas S. Dye, 2017/12/18