[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [O] Breaking up long #+TBLFM line?
From: |
Loris Bennett |
Subject: |
Re: [O] Breaking up long #+TBLFM line? |
Date: |
Tue, 26 Jan 2016 08:48:57 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.4 (gnu/linux) |
Hi Nick,
Nick Dokos <address@hidden> writes:
[snip: Loris' whinging and Karl's response (24 lines)]
>> However, I still don't like the long #+TBLFM, although it's not going to
>> kill me.
>>
>
> That's good, because I think you'll have to live with it :-)
>
> There is support for multiple TBLFM lines, but not in the way you want:
> they are alternatives, rather than cumulative - see
>
> (info "(org) Editing and debugging formulas")
>
> the section entitled "Using multiple #+TBLFM lines".
I was aware of this and have found it useful.
However, it seems a little inconsistent that some options, like
'#+OPTIONS' or '#+LATEX_HEADER', are cumulative whereas others, like
'#+TBLFM', are not. Is there a logic to this that I am overlooking? If
not, is there an overview of how the different options behave?
Cheers,
Loris
--
This signature is currently under construction.
- [O] Breaking up long #+TBLFM line?, Loris Bennett, 2016/01/20
- Re: [O] Breaking up long #+TBLFM line?, Karl Voit, 2016/01/25
- Re: [O] Breaking up long #+TBLFM line?, Loris Bennett, 2016/01/25
- Re: [O] Breaking up long #+TBLFM line?, Loris Bennett, 2016/01/25
- Re: [O] Breaking up long #+TBLFM line?, Nick Dokos, 2016/01/25
- Re: [O] Breaking up long #+TBLFM line?, Samuel Wales, 2016/01/25
- [O] table editor is off screen (was: Breaking up long #+TBLFM line?), Karl Voit, 2016/01/26
- Re: [O] table editor is off screen, Nicolas Goaziou, 2016/01/26
- Re: [O] table editor is off screen, Samuel Wales, 2016/01/26
- Re: [O] Breaking up long #+TBLFM line?,
Loris Bennett <=
- Re: [O] Breaking up long #+TBLFM line?, Nicolas Goaziou, 2016/01/26