[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [O] #+CALL get the first row of output table lost when using latex e
From: |
Charles Berry |
Subject: |
Re: [O] #+CALL get the first row of output table lost when using latex export |
Date: |
Sun, 16 Nov 2014 18:37:53 +0000 (UTC) |
User-agent: |
Loom/3.14 (http://gmane.org/) |
<iemacs <at> gmail.com> writes:
>
> Hi,
>
> I encounter a problem when I use #+CALL to create a table with latex
> export. The problem is that the first row of the table is missing, if
> the table is created with #+CALL.
>
[deleted - setup info]
> The minimal table example is
>
> #+BEGIN_EXAMPLE
> #+NAME: t1
> #+BEGIN_SRC python :exports results
> return [['A'],None,[2]]
> #+END_SRC
>
> #+CAPTION: T1
> #+RESULTS: t1
>
> #+NAME: t2
> #+CALL: t1() :exports results
>
> #+CAPTION: T2
> #+RESULTS: t2
> #+END_EXAMPLE
>
This is not a latex issue per se. If you evaluate t2 with
`org-babel-execute-maybe'
the same thing will happen.
org-babel-execute:python does its own formatting. #+CALL: OTOH passes
the results to babel.
The workaround is to use
#+CALL: t1() :colnames yes
HTH,
Chuck