[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [O] Syntax inconsistency?
From: |
Marcin Borkowski |
Subject: |
Re: [O] Syntax inconsistency? |
Date: |
Mon, 03 Nov 2014 14:17:55 +0100 |
On 2014-11-03, at 09:28, Nicolas Goaziou wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Marcin Borkowski <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> just wondering: on one hand, we have lines like
>>
>> #+OPTIONS: toc:nil
>
> This is a keyword.
>
>> On the other hand, we have
>>
>> #+ATTR_ASCII: :width 10
>
> This is an attribute.
>
>> Why is the syntax (seemingly, at least) inconsistent? Why not
>> `width:10' or `:toc nil'?
>
> These are two different things, so there is no real reason to make them
> look like each other. Also, and more importantly, moving OPTIONS to the
> other syntax is, IMO, unreadable:
>
> #+OPTIONS: :| t :^ nil :* t :\n t
>
> Note there is also another syntax type, e.g.,:
>
> #+TOC: headlines 2
Thanks for your clarifications! Things seem still a bit hazy for me,
but I guess I'll have to live with it:-).
> Regards,
Best,
--
Marcin Borkowski
http://octd.wmi.amu.edu.pl/en/Marcin_Borkowski
Adam Mickiewicz University