[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [O] AUCTeX key bindings within Org documents

From: Marcin Borkowski
Subject: Re: [O] AUCTeX key bindings within Org documents
Date: Sat, 28 Sep 2013 12:04:20 +0200

Dnia 2013-09-28, o godz. 11:56:05
Suvayu Ali <address@hidden> napisaƂ(a):

> On Sat, Sep 28, 2013 at 10:15:28AM +0200, Fabrice Niessen wrote:
> > >
> > >> If you're interested, check it out at
> > >> https://github.com/fniessen/org-auctex-key-bindings.
> > >
> > > I see no licence, which I think (though IANAL) is equal to a
> > > strict and super restrictive copyright ; is that intended ?
> > 
> > No, it's just that I'm lost when it comes down to copyrights,
> > copylefts, and all the subtle meanings and implications of that.
> > 
> > Any advice on what to put? The purpose is, of course, that it can
> > be freely used, copied, etc.
> I think "Public Domain" is the most open you can go.  Otherwise "GPL
> v2" is always good.

Also, Creative Commons seem to be quite easy to understand (and most of
them are a bit more restrictive than PD, or CC0).  I'm not sure whether
they can apply to software, though.


Marcin Borkowski
Adam Mickiewicz University

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]