[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [O] mixed orgmode installation
From: |
Achim Gratz |
Subject: |
Re: [O] mixed orgmode installation |
Date: |
Sun, 08 Sep 2013 18:41:59 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) |
John Hendy writes:
> Could you elaborate on this? I'd always thought the exact opposite due
> to being burned in the past by stale junk littered around /usr/lib,
> /usr/bin, /usr/local/[bin/sbin]. Thus, for some things, I prefer to
> run them from the git repository since I know where they'll be vs.
> where `make install` might desire to put them.
Git provides and manages the source tree and nothing else. To get a
reliable Org you need a self-consistent and complete installation — that
is usually provided by the build system.
http://orgmode.org/worg/dev/org-build-system.html
The most logical place for that Org installation is site-lisp (since
then load-path is already set up correctly), but you can install almost
anywhere as long as you know where load-path is pointing to at all
times. You could then have multiple versions of Org installed and use
them for different instances or versiosn of Emacs (one at a time,
obviously).
> What happens, for example, in this situation:
> - git clone
> - make && make install
You just need to "make install" and it's been that way for over two
years now…
> - some file.el gets moved from org.git/contrib/lisp to org.git/lisp in master
> - git pull
> - make && make install
And this is what "make up2" is doing, plus testing so the install won't
be attempted if the tests don't pass.
> Are there now two copies of file.el somewhere in the system?
No, unless you've changed the install location inbetween. If a file
would be removed (or renamed), then you'd need to first issue a "make
clean-install" to make sure it is really gone from your installation.
> Anyway, if there's more to read on some of your situations, I'd love
> to know as I've been doing exactly that and want to stop if it's
> recommended against! Thanks for mentioning the potential risk, as I
> had no idea!
I'm not exactly sure what problem you are talking about, maybe you could
clarify. In any case it seems there's been a mixup of different problems
in this thread.
Regards,
Achim.
--
+<[Q+ Matrix-12 WAVE#46+305 Neuron microQkb Andromeda XTk Blofeld]>+
Factory and User Sound Singles for Waldorf rackAttack:
http://Synth.Stromeko.net/Downloads.html#WaldorfSounds
- Re: [O] mixed orgmode installation, (continued)
- Re: [O] mixed orgmode installation, Thorsten Jolitz, 2013/09/04
- Re: [O] mixed orgmode installation, Johannes Rainer, 2013/09/04
- Re: [O] mixed orgmode installation, Suvayu Ali, 2013/09/04
- Re: [O] mixed orgmode installation, adam, 2013/09/08
- Re: [O] mixed orgmode installation, John Hendy, 2013/09/08
- Re: [O] mixed orgmode installation, Suvayu Ali, 2013/09/08
- Re: [O] mixed orgmode installation, John Hendy, 2013/09/08
- Re: [O] mixed orgmode installation, Achim Gratz, 2013/09/08
Re: [O] mixed orgmode installation, Achim Gratz, 2013/09/04