[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [O] org-mobile-push vs. symlinks
From: |
Bastien |
Subject: |
Re: [O] org-mobile-push vs. symlinks |
Date: |
Thu, 03 Jan 2013 13:10:10 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.130006 (Ma Gnus v0.6) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) |
Hi James,
James Harkins <address@hidden> writes:
> - One should not put symlinks into org-directory, or at least make
> sure the symlink's name is the same as the target. If this is an
> intentional limitation, it should be documented.
>
> - Or, the symlink resolution is not actually necessary and it causes
> problems. In that case, it's a bug that should be fixed.
>
> Which is it? :-)
I'd say the first one :)
--
Bastien
- Re: [O] org-mobile-push vs. symlinks,
Bastien <=
- Re: [O] org-mobile-push vs. symlinks, James Harkins, 2013/01/04
- Re: [O] org-mobile-push vs. symlinks, Bastien, 2013/01/04
- Re: [O] org-mobile-push vs. symlinks, James Harkins, 2013/01/06
- Re: [O] org-mobile-push vs. symlinks, Bastien, 2013/01/06
- Re: [O] org-mobile-push vs. symlinks, James Harkins, 2013/01/06
- Re: [O] org-mobile-push vs. symlinks, Bastien, 2013/01/06
- Re: [O] org-mobile-push vs. symlinks, Bastien, 2013/01/07