[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [O] [RFC] Standardized code block keywords
From: |
Daniel Bausch |
Subject: |
Re: [O] [RFC] Standardized code block keywords |
Date: |
Wed, 26 Oct 2011 07:58:58 +0200 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/2.6.39-gentoo-r3; KDE/4.6.5; i686; ; ) |
Am Dienstag 25 Oktober 2011, 19:21:22 schrieb Nick Dokos:
> Eric Schulte <address@hidden> wrote:
> > Martyn Jago <address@hidden> writes:
> > > Nick Dokos <address@hidden> writes:
> > >> Eric Schulte <address@hidden> wrote:
> > >>> Surprisingly (to me) srcname is the winner here, but luckily I
> > >>> haven't yet voted, and although I would have though #+source: would
> > >>> have been the winner I like the simplicity of using #+name: for
> > >>> named code blocks as well as named data. So I'll vote for #+name:
> > >>> here making it a tie, and I'll also take tie-breaking powers upon
> > >>> myself giving #+name: the win.
> > >>
> > >> This is going to cost you, Schulte! It's not going to go down that
> > >> easily. I'll call the FTC, the FCC, the SCOTUS, the POTUS, the NYT,
> > >> the BDFL, the NFL and the MLB: an outrage I tell you! An affront to
> > >> the democratic rules some of us cherish! We'll fight to the death!
> > >> Who's with me?
> >
> > Ha!
> >
> > Well at least SCOTUS should be on my side, as they seem to have no
> > problem giving some people more freedom than others.
>
> Indeed - but what about the NFL? I bet they have more integrity.
>
>
> On second thought...
>
> > > +1 #+name
>
> Back stabber!
Oops, I didn't want to split the community. Be nice to each other.
> > Well thank goodness, even if I can't put my own thumb on the scale it
> > seems I can advertise enough to sway voters to my cause. :)
>
> Bribery and Corruption - what is the world coming to?
>
> > Cheers -- Eric
> >
> > > mj
- Re: [O] [RFC] Standardized code block keywords, (continued)
- Re: [O] [RFC] Standardized code block keywords, Sebastien Vauban, 2011/10/24
- Re: [O] [RFC] Standardized code block keywords, Eric Schulte, 2011/10/24
- Re: [O] [RFC] Standardized code block keywords, Daniel Bausch, 2011/10/25
- Re: [O] [RFC] Standardized code block keywords, Sebastien Vauban, 2011/10/25
- Re: [O] [RFC] Standardized code block keywords, Eric Schulte, 2011/10/25
- Re: [O] [RFC] Standardized code block keywords, Christian Moe, 2011/10/25
- Re: [O] [RFC] Standardized code block keywords, Nick Dokos, 2011/10/25
- Re: [O] [RFC] Standardized code block keywords, Martyn Jago, 2011/10/25
- Re: [O] [RFC] Standardized code block keywords, Eric Schulte, 2011/10/25
- Re: [O] [RFC] Standardized code block keywords, Nick Dokos, 2011/10/25
- Re: [O] [RFC] Standardized code block keywords,
Daniel Bausch <=
- Re: [O] [RFC] Standardized code block keywords, Giovanni Ridolfi, 2011/10/26
- Re: [O] [RFC] Standardized code block keywords, Daniel Bausch, 2011/10/26
- Re: [O] [RFC] Standardized code block keywords, Nick Dokos, 2011/10/26
- Re: [O] [RFC] Standardized code block keywords, Daniel Bausch, 2011/10/27
- Re: [O] [RFC] Standardized code block keywords, Eric Schulte, 2011/10/28
- Re: [O] [RFC] Standardized code block keywords, Eric Schulte, 2011/10/28
- Re: [O] [RFC] Standardized code block keywords, Nick Dokos, 2011/10/28
- Re: [O] [RFC] Standardized code block keywords, Eric Schulte, 2011/10/28
- Re: [O] [RFC] Standardized code block keywords, Nick Dokos, 2011/10/28
- Re: [O] [RFC] Standardized code block keywords, Thomas S. Dye, 2011/10/28