[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [O] Surprising behaviour with agenda file
From: |
Carsten Dominik |
Subject: |
Re: [O] Surprising behaviour with agenda file |
Date: |
Tue, 4 Oct 2011 14:33:51 +0200 |
This patch has now been accepted - I believe the performance hit will be minor.
I would like to know if this is not the case...
- Carsten
On Sep 29, 2011, at 5:48 PM, Andreas Amann wrote:
> On Thu, 29 Sep 2011 15:43:27 +0200, Michael Brand <address@hidden> wrote:
>> On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 15:25, Daniel Bausch <address@hidden> wrote:
>>> It's not a bug, it's a feature (although I don't know what it's for -- maybe
>>> speed). However, there is a customizable option to switch it off:
>>> org-agenda-skip-additional-timestamps-same-entry
>>
>> Interesting. git blame and a list search leads quickly to this post
>> and thread that answers some questions:
>> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.orgmode/13096/focus=13129
>
> Okay, I see.
>
> In my opinion the current default is unsafe, since people can lose
> appointments.
>
> I propose to change the default of
> org-agenda-skip-additional-timestamps-same-entry
> as below.
>
> Andreas
>
>
> --------------------------------
> commit 967ee90b3b05bad69b84fa3e5411f2d645121d6a
> Author: Andreas Amann <address@hidden>
> Date: Thu Sep 29 16:14:58 2011 +0100
>
> change default of org-agenda-skip-additional-timestamps-same-entry to nil
>
> diff --git a/lisp/org-agenda.el b/lisp/org-agenda.el
> index b1fa5f5..20d55f7 100644
> --- a/lisp/org-agenda.el
> +++ b/lisp/org-agenda.el
> @@ -787,7 +787,7 @@ because you will take care of it on the day when
> scheduled."
> (const :tag "Remove prewarning if entry is scheduled" t)
> (integer :tag "Restart prewarning N days before deadline")))
>
> -(defcustom org-agenda-skip-additional-timestamps-same-entry t
> +(defcustom org-agenda-skip-additional-timestamps-same-entry nil
> "When nil, multiple same-day timestamps in entry make multiple agenda lines.
> When non-nil, after the search for timestamps has matched once in an
> entry, the rest of the entry will not be searched."
> ----------------------------------
>
>
>
- Carsten
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- Re: [O] Surprising behaviour with agenda file,
Carsten Dominik <=