emacs-elpa-diffs
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[elpa] externals/denote f9b86149fc 102/355: Rephrase package overview


From: ELPA Syncer
Subject: [elpa] externals/denote f9b86149fc 102/355: Rephrase package overview
Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2022 23:58:05 -0400 (EDT)

branch: externals/denote
commit f9b86149fcf3115cd1510258b9913736586df337
Author: Protesilaos Stavrou <info@protesilaos.com>
Commit: Protesilaos Stavrou <info@protesilaos.com>

    Rephrase package overview
---
 README.org | 18 ++++++++++--------
 denote.el  | 18 ++++++++++--------
 2 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)

diff --git a/README.org b/README.org
index 13331c3e41..d89c6af2a3 100644
--- a/README.org
+++ b/README.org
@@ -80,14 +80,16 @@ files.
 What Denote prioritizes with the enforcement of a strict file-naming
 scheme is portability.  Notes can be accessed, filtered, and understood
 without Emacs or any other advanced tool for that matter (though Emacs,
-Org, and others are excellent programs).
+Org, and the like are excellent programs).
 
-Denote has no mechanism to test for adherence to a given note-taking
-method, such as that of Zettelkasten (i.e. the contemporary digital
-equivalent of Niklas Luhmann's methodology).  It is possible to employ
-such a method, though it is ultimately up to the user to apply the
-requisite rigor.  What matters for our purposes is that Denote is not a
-zettelkasten implementation per se.
+Denote only has a strong opinion about the file name.  It otherwise is
+flexible and poses no constraints on the desired workflow.  Denote has
+no mechanism to test for adherence to a given note-taking method, such
+as that of Zettelkasten (i.e. the contemporary digital equivalent of
+Niklas Luhmann's methodology).  It is possible to employ such a method,
+though it is ultimately up to the user to apply the requisite rigor.
+What matters for our purposes is that Denote is not a zettelkasten
+implementation per se.
 
 By default, Denote creates note files using the =.org= extension.
 However, Denote does not depend on org.el or any of its accoutrements
@@ -101,7 +103,7 @@ concept.  Plus, we can come up with acronyms (of dubious 
utility) like:
 + Don't Ever Note Only The Ephemeral
 + Denote Everything Neatly; Omit The Excesses
 
-But we'll let you get back to work.  Don't Escape or Neglect your
+But we'll let you get back to work.  Don't Eschew or Neglect your
 Obligations, Tasks, Engagements...
 
 * The file-naming scheme
diff --git a/denote.el b/denote.el
index 733f58b94a..bdb23d64a2 100644
--- a/denote.el
+++ b/denote.el
@@ -34,14 +34,16 @@
 ;; What Denote prioritizes with the enforcement of a strict file-naming
 ;; scheme is portability.  Notes can be accessed, filtered, and understood
 ;; without Emacs or any other advanced tool for that matter (though Emacs,
-;; Org, and others are excellent programs).
+;; Org, and the like are excellent programs).
 ;;
-;; Denote has no mechanism to test for adherence to a given note-taking
-;; method, such as that of Zettelkasten (i.e. the contemporary digital
-;; equivalent of Niklas Luhmann's methodology).  It is possible to employ
-;; such a method, though it is ultimately up to the user to apply the
-;; requisite rigor.  What matters for our purposes is that Denote is not a
-;; zettelkasten implementation per se.
+;; Denote only has a strong opinion about the file name.  It otherwise is
+;; flexible and poses no constraints on the desired workflow.  Denote has
+;; no mechanism to test for adherence to a given note-taking method, such
+;; as that of Zettelkasten (i.e. the contemporary digital equivalent of
+;; Niklas Luhmann's methodology).  It is possible to employ such a method,
+;; though it is ultimately up to the user to apply the requisite rigor.
+;; What matters for our purposes is that Denote is not a zettelkasten
+;; implementation per se.
 ;;
 ;; By default, Denote creates note files using the `.org' extension.
 ;; However, Denote does not depend on org.el or any of its accoutrements
@@ -55,7 +57,7 @@
 ;; + Don't Ever Note Only The Ephemeral
 ;; + Denote Everything Neatly; Omit The Excesses
 ;;
-;; But we'll let you get back to work.  Don't Escape or Neglect your
+;; But we'll let you get back to work.  Don't Eschew or Neglect your
 ;; Obligations, Tasks, Engagements...
 
 ;;; Code:



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]