[elpa] externals/vertico 60554ca: Expand README

[ELPA Syncer]

branch: externals/vertico
commit 60554ca0ec23c8ad47367b12d5ba5d5a5955a098
Author: Daniel Mendler <mail@daniel-mendler.de>
Commit: Daniel Mendler <mail@daniel-mendler.de>

    Expand README
---
 README.org | 26 ++++++++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/README.org b/README.org
index bdad338..c34cb33 100644
--- a/README.org
+++ b/README.org
@@ -322,21 +322,31 @@ packages a try and judge for yourself.
 
   There are other interactive completion UIs, which follow a similar 
philosophy:
 
-  - [[https://github.com/raxod502/selectrum][Selectrum]]: Selectrum has a 
similar UI as Vertico. Selectrum is more complex
-    and not fully compatible with every Emacs completion command 
([[https://github.com/raxod502/selectrum/issues/481][Issue #481]]),
-    since it uses its own filtering infrastructure, which deviates from the
-    standard Emacs completion facilities. Vertico additionally has the ability
-    to cycle over candidates, offers commands for grouping support and comes
-    with a rich set of [[#extensions][extensions]].
+  - [[https://github.com/raxod502/selectrum][Selectrum]]: Selectrum has a 
similar UI as Vertico, since it directly inspired
+    Vertico. The Selectrum code base is more complex. Unfortunately Selectrum 
is
+    not fully compatible with every Emacs completion command 
([[https://github.com/raxod502/selectrum/issues/481][Issue #481]]), since
+    it uses its own filtering infrastructure, which deviates from the standard
+    Emacs completion facilities. Vertico additionally has the ability to cycle
+    over candidates, offers commands for grouping support and comes with a rich
+    set of [[#extensions][extensions]].
   - [[https://github.com/oantolin/icomplete-vertical][Icomplete-vertical]]: 
This package enhances the Emacs builtin Icomplete with a
     vertical display. In contrast to Vertico, Icomplete rotates the candidates
     such that the current candidate always appears at the top. From my
     perspective, candidate rotation feels a bit less intuitive than the UI of
     Vertico or Selectrum. Note that Emacs 28 offers a built-in
     ~icomplete-vertical-mode~.
-  - [[https://gitlab.com/protesilaos/mct][Mct]]: Minibuffer and Completions in 
Tandem. Mct reuses the default completions
+  - [[https://gitlab.com/protesilaos/mct][Mct]]: Minibuffer and Completions in 
Tandem. Mct reuses the default ~*Completions*~
     buffer and enhances it with automatic updates and additional keybindings, 
to
-    select a candidate and move between minibuffer and completions buffer.
+    select a candidate and move between minibuffer and completions buffer. Mct
+    is great if you prefer an unobtrusive UI since it can be configured to open
+    only when requested. Furthermore since Mct uses a fully functional buffer
+    you can reuse all your familar buffer commands inside the completions
+    buffer. The main distinction to an approach like Vertico's is that
+    ~*Completions*~ buffer displays all matching candidates. On the one hand 
this
+    is good since it allows you to interact with all the candidates and jump
+    around with Isearch or Avy. On the other hand it necessarily causes a small
+    slowdown in comparison to Vertico, which only displays a small subset of
+    candidates.
 
 * Problematic completion commands