[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[elpa] master 9b44795 03/23: Exit the meta[name]-checking business.

From: Stefan Monnier
Subject: [elpa] master 9b44795 03/23: Exit the meta[name]-checking business.
Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2016 19:22:33 +0000

branch: master
commit 9b4479574a3c0dfd9329f438043b5b77f8ac5747
Author: Michael[tm] Smith <address@hidden>
Commit: Michael[tm] Smith <address@hidden>

    Exit the meta[name]-checking business.
    Removed the code for checking if meta[name] values are registered. While
    admiring the spirit behind the original requirement, the experiment has
    failed in practice. It's ended up costing a huge amount of maintenance time
    for something that was of very little benefit to end users to begin with --
    even if it had ever worked as conceived. But it's not working as conceived
    -- in fact at this point it's mostly just wasting the time of both users
    and maintainers. So, enough is enough -- let's cut our losses.
 meta.rnc |    2 +-
 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/meta.rnc b/meta.rnc
index 91d9d1c..92aaf5e 100644
--- a/meta.rnc
+++ b/meta.rnc
@@ -249,7 +249,7 @@ datatypes w = "http://whattf.org/datatype-draft";
                meta.name.attrs.name =
                        attribute name {
-                               w:meta-name
+                               w:non-empty-string
                meta.name.attrs.content =
                        attribute content {

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]