emacs-diffs
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Emacs-diffs] Changes to emacs/lisp/woman.el


From: Juanma Barranquero
Subject: [Emacs-diffs] Changes to emacs/lisp/woman.el
Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2005 10:09:51 -0400

Index: emacs/lisp/woman.el
diff -c emacs/lisp/woman.el:1.28 emacs/lisp/woman.el:1.29
*** emacs/lisp/woman.el:1.28    Fri Jun 10 08:07:28 2005
--- emacs/lisp/woman.el Fri Jun 10 14:09:51 2005
***************
*** 823,835 ****
  
  (defcustom woman-bold-headings t
    "*If non-nil then embolden section and subsection headings.  Default is t.
! Heading emboldening is NOT standard `man' behaviour."
    :type 'boolean
    :group 'woman-formatting)
  
  (defcustom woman-ignore t
    "*If non-nil then unrecognised requests etc. are ignored.  Default is t.
! This gives the standard ?roff behaviour.  If nil then they are left in
  the buffer, which may aid debugging."
    :type 'boolean
    :group 'woman-formatting)
--- 823,835 ----
  
  (defcustom woman-bold-headings t
    "*If non-nil then embolden section and subsection headings.  Default is t.
! Heading emboldening is NOT standard `man' behavior."
    :type 'boolean
    :group 'woman-formatting)
  
  (defcustom woman-ignore t
    "*If non-nil then unrecognised requests etc. are ignored.  Default is t.
! This gives the standard ?roff behavior.  If nil then they are left in
  the buffer, which may aid debugging."
    :type 'boolean
    :group 'woman-formatting)
***************
*** 876,882 ****
  ;; You should probably select either italic or underline as you prefer, but
  ;; not both, although italic and underline work together perfectly well!
  (defface woman-italic
!   `((((min-colors 88) (background light)) 
       (:slant italic :underline t :foreground "red1"))
      (((background light)) (:slant italic :underline t :foreground "red"))
      (((background dark)) (:slant italic :underline t)))
--- 876,882 ----
  ;; You should probably select either italic or underline as you prefer, but
  ;; not both, although italic and underline work together perfectly well!
  (defface woman-italic
!   `((((min-colors 88) (background light))
       (:slant italic :underline t :foreground "red1"))
      (((background light)) (:slant italic :underline t :foreground "red"))
      (((background dark)) (:slant italic :underline t)))
***************
*** 914,926 ****
  (put 'woman-addition-face 'face-alias 'woman-addition)
  
  (defun woman-default-faces ()
!   "Set foreground colours of italic and bold faces to their default values."
    (interactive)
    (face-spec-set 'woman-italic (face-user-default-spec 'woman-italic))
    (face-spec-set 'woman-bold (face-user-default-spec 'woman-bold)))
  
  (defun woman-monochrome-faces ()
!   "Set foreground colours of italic and bold faces to that of the default 
face.
  This is usually either black or white."
    (interactive)
    (set-face-foreground 'woman-italic 'unspecified)
--- 914,926 ----
  (put 'woman-addition-face 'face-alias 'woman-addition)
  
  (defun woman-default-faces ()
!   "Set foreground colors of italic and bold faces to their default values."
    (interactive)
    (face-spec-set 'woman-italic (face-user-default-spec 'woman-italic))
    (face-spec-set 'woman-bold (face-user-default-spec 'woman-bold)))
  
  (defun woman-monochrome-faces ()
!   "Set foreground colors of italic and bold faces to that of the default face.
  This is usually either black or white."
    (interactive)
    (set-face-foreground 'woman-italic 'unspecified)




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]