[Emacs-diffs] Changes to emacs/lisp/gnus/gnus-art.el

[Stefan Monnier]

Index: emacs/lisp/gnus/gnus-art.el
diff -c emacs/lisp/gnus/gnus-art.el:1.74 emacs/lisp/gnus/gnus-art.el:1.75
*** emacs/lisp/gnus/gnus-art.el:1.74    Wed Jun  1 05:07:06 2005
--- emacs/lisp/gnus/gnus-art.el Fri Jun  3 22:03:47 2005
***************
*** 367,374 ****
                      (or (nth 4 spec) 3)
                      (intern (format "gnus-emphasis-%s" (nth 2 spec)))))
              types))
!      '(("\\(\\s-\\|^\\)\\(-\\(\\(\\w\\|-[^-]\\)+\\)-\\)\\(\\s-\\|[?!.,;]\\)"
!       2 3 gnus-emphasis-strikethru)
         ("\\(\\s-\\|^\\)\\(_\\(\\(\\w\\|_[^_]\\)+\\)_\\)\\(\\s-\\|[?!.,;]\\)"
        2 3 gnus-emphasis-underline))))
    "*Alist that says how to fontify certain phrases.
--- 367,378 ----
                      (or (nth 4 spec) 3)
                      (intern (format "gnus-emphasis-%s" (nth 2 spec)))))
              types))
!      '(;; I've never seen anyone use this strikethru convention whereas I've
!        ;; several times seen it triggered by normal text.  --Stef
!        ;; Miles suggests that this form is sometimes used but for italics,
!        ;; so maybe we should map it to `italic'.
!        ;; 
("\\(\\s-\\|^\\)\\(-\\(\\(\\w\\|-[^-]\\)+\\)-\\)\\(\\s-\\|[?!.,;]\\)"
!        ;; 2 3 gnus-emphasis-strikethru)
         ("\\(\\s-\\|^\\)\\(_\\(\\(\\w\\|_[^_]\\)+\\)_\\)\\(\\s-\\|[?!.,;]\\)"
        2 3 gnus-emphasis-underline))))
    "*Alist that says how to fontify certain phrases.