Re: Adding a generic mathematical library

[Emanuel Berg]

Michael Heerdegen via "Emacs development discussions." wrote:

>> It is much better to just say "we have decided not to do
>> it" in post one.
>
> Nobody decided anything. Eli and others have to keep an eye
> on that what people contribute fits into Emacs and doesn't
> cause problems in the future.
>
> You started a discussion, valid questions and concerns have
> been raised in response, and you just don't answer them, you
> ignore valid questions.

Yes, I ignore, or optimally that would be the case anyway,
anything and everything that has to do with _me_ whenever
there is, or should be, a discussion about something else.

If we, collectively, want generic libraries instead of having
everything everywhere (and math in Calc as well as local
code), then let's do it.

If we, collectively, don't want to do it for whatever reason,
that's fine - but then just don't say it is because something
that has to do with _me_.

I have nothing to do with other people not wanting to do
things, people can take their insults somewhere else.

-- 
underground experts united
https://dataswamp.org/~incal