[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: MPS: Forwording symbols
From: |
Ihor Radchenko |
Subject: |
Re: MPS: Forwording symbols |
Date: |
Fri, 21 Jun 2024 16:15:39 +0000 |
Helmut Eller <eller.helmut@gmail.com> writes:
> Can we use similar reasoning to remove fix_fwd? If predicate is
> guaranteed to be a builtin symbol, then we don't need to do anything for
> the Lisp_Buffer_Objfwd case.
A side note: If some parts of the code now has to be careful about
handling built-in/non-builtin symbols, would it make sense to add some
relevant assertions to the debug build? Otherwise, future changes in
Emacs may accidentally introduce hard-to-debug crashes.
--
Ihor Radchenko // yantar92,
Org mode contributor,
Learn more about Org mode at <https://orgmode.org/>.
Support Org development at <https://liberapay.com/org-mode>,
or support my work at <https://liberapay.com/yantar92>
- Re: MPS: Forwording symbols, (continued)
- Re: MPS: Forwording symbols, Gerd Möllmann, 2024/06/21
- Re: MPS: Forwording symbols, Gerd Möllmann, 2024/06/21
- Re: MPS: Forwording symbols, Helmut Eller, 2024/06/22
- Re: MPS: Forwording symbols, Gerd Möllmann, 2024/06/22
- Re: MPS: Forwording symbols, Helmut Eller, 2024/06/22
- Re: MPS: Forwording symbols, Gerd Möllmann, 2024/06/22
- Re: MPS: Forwording symbols, Gerd Möllmann, 2024/06/22
- Re: MPS: Forwording symbols, Gerd Möllmann, 2024/06/23
- Re: MPS: Forwording symbols, Helmut Eller, 2024/06/23
- Re: MPS: Forwording symbols, Gerd Möllmann, 2024/06/23
Re: MPS: Forwording symbols,
Ihor Radchenko <=