[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: (declare (type (function...
|
From: |
Emanuel Berg |
|
Subject: |
Re: (declare (type (function... |
|
Date: |
Thu, 09 May 2024 15:43:16 +0200 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) |
Simon Leinen wrote:
>> (defun foo (x y)
>> (declare (ftype (function (integer number) number) foo))
>> (+ x y))
>>
>> Common lispers can live with that.
>
> Yes, please :-)
Maybe it is time for a new language called Exceptional Lisp.
--
underground experts united
https://dataswamp.org/~incal
- Re: (declare (type (function..., (continued)
Re: (declare (type (function..., Andrea Corallo, 2024/05/07
- Re: (declare (type (function..., Emanuel Berg, 2024/05/08
- Re: (declare (type (function..., Emanuel Berg, 2024/05/08
- Re: (declare (type (function..., Marco Antoniotti, 2024/05/08
- Re: (declare (type (function..., Andrea Corallo, 2024/05/10
- Re: (declare (type (function..., Marco Antoniotti, 2024/05/10
- Re: (declare (type (function..., Andrea Corallo, 2024/05/10
- Re: (declare (type (function..., Stefan Monnier, 2024/05/10
- Re: (declare (type (function..., Marco Antoniotti, 2024/05/10
Re: (declare (type (function..., Marco Antoniotti, 2024/05/10
Re: (declare (type (function..., Eli Zaretskii, 2024/05/11
Re: (declare (type (function..., Andrea Corallo, 2024/05/13
Re: (declare (type (function..., Andrea Corallo, 2024/05/14
Re: (declare (type (function..., Marco Antoniotti, 2024/05/14