Re: MPS GC and its implications

[Mattias Engdegård]

4 maj 2024 kl. 11.39 skrev Helmut Eller <eller.helmut@gmail.com>:
> 
>> So if the above is the only way, we are going to lose a valuable
>> debugging aid, I think.
> 
> I agree.  But we have to give MPS something to work with.  Also, with
> some effort we could regain some of the lost context; especially if we
> are willing to modify MPS itself.

Would it be possible to arrange for another signal to be raised immediately if 
the MPS discriminator rejects the SEGV as not being part of its barrier?