[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Should native compilation be enabled by default?
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: Should native compilation be enabled by default? |
Date: |
Fri, 15 Mar 2024 17:13:03 +0200 |
> From: Colin Baxter <m43cap@yandex.com>
> Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
> Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2024 13:14:54 +0000
>
> >>>>> Ihor Radchenko <yantar92@posteo.net> writes:
>
> > That post is two years old, from the times when GCC 10 (that has
> > libgccjit) was just released. Now, after two years, when the
> > latest GCC is GCC 13, we can reasonably expect that most Linux
> > installations have libgccjit.
>
> Well, mine doesn't.
If your system doesn't have libgccjit installed, the configure script
will automatically produce a build without native compilation.
- Re: Should native compilation be enabled by default?, (continued)
- Re: Should native compilation be enabled by default?, Eli Zaretskii, 2024/03/15
- Re: Should native compilation be enabled by default?, Colin Baxter, 2024/03/15
- Re: Should native compilation be enabled by default?, Andrea Corallo, 2024/03/15
- Re: Should native compilation be enabled by default?, Emanuel Berg, 2024/03/16
- Re: Should native compilation be enabled by default?, Eli Zaretskii, 2024/03/16
- Re: Should native compilation be enabled by default?, Emanuel Berg, 2024/03/15
- Re: Should native compilation be enabled by default?, Andrea Corallo, 2024/03/15
- Re: Should native compilation be enabled by default?, Emanuel Berg, 2024/03/15
- Re: Should native compilation be enabled by default?,
Eli Zaretskii <=
Re: Re: Should native compilation be enabled by default?, Pedro Andres Aranda Gutierrez, 2024/03/06
Re: Re: Should native compilation be enabled by default?, Pedro Andres Aranda Gutierrez, 2024/03/16