[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: cond*
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: cond* |
Date: |
Sun, 07 Jan 2024 22:47:23 -0500 |
[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider ]]]
[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]]
[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
> > Since the idea is pattern-matching, I think that a regexp is natural
> > as well as more general. Why not do this?
> It is not very clear then how to match plain strings for equality.
1. Instead of writing the string as a literal, write a regexp to match
only that string. This is not hard.
2. Use this constrained variable patern:
(equal foo "xyz")
It will bind the variable `foo', but you are not required to use it.
--
Dr Richard Stallman (https://stallman.org)
Chief GNUisance of the GNU Project (https://gnu.org)
Founder, Free Software Foundation (https://fsf.org)
Internet Hall-of-Famer (https://internethalloffame.org)
- Re: cond*, (continued)
- Re: cond*, Ihor Radchenko, 2024/01/03
- Re: cond*, Richard Stallman, 2024/01/05
- Re: cond*, Ihor Radchenko, 2024/01/06
- Re: cond*, Richard Stallman, 2024/01/07
- Re: cond*, Ihor Radchenko, 2024/01/08
- Re: cond*, Richard Stallman, 2024/01/26
Re: cond*, Richard Stallman, 2024/01/02
- Re: cond*, Ihor Radchenko, 2024/01/03
- Re: cond*, Richard Stallman, 2024/01/05
- Re: cond*, Ihor Radchenko, 2024/01/06
- Re: cond*,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: cond*, Ihor Radchenko, 2024/01/08